Smoke Deposits - Science or Myth

Smoke Deposits - Science or Myth

Postby Batman » Mon Aug 24, 2009 8:11 am

In the previous thread there is a reference to the benefit of smoke/tar products building up on the smoking equipment being beneficial. Whilst I've repeated this before, myself, what do you think is the benefit, particularly for home smokers with access to modern materials, or is this just another (old days) food myth?

Taste, hygiene, business longevity, cost, other?
TonyB

Visit my blog at www.batty.me.uk
Batman
Registered Member
 
Posts: 197
Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2008 8:36 am
Location: Northumberland, UK

Postby saucisson » Mon Aug 24, 2009 8:54 am

I must admit to passing it on as acquired wisdom too... :D

However, few thoughts:

1) the acidic tar (which will dissolve aluminium :shock: ) must act as an antibacterial coating.
2) It permeates the smokehouse with the smell of mature smoke so some of that presumably gets into the food. It's possible (ie pure speculation) that over time the tar matures and releases new volatiles that you wouldn't find in raw smoke.
3) It gives the smokehouse an authentic traditional look, much more impressive to the layman who wants to see what your smokehouse looks like.
4) It's nasty dirty stuff to have to clean off so any excuse to leave it there has to be a good one :)

Dave
Curing is not an exact science... So it's not a sin to bin.

Great hams, from little acorns grow...
User avatar
saucisson
Site Admin
 
Posts: 6851
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 8:46 pm
Location: Oxford UK

Postby lemonD » Mon Aug 24, 2009 11:04 am

I'd go with No2, it's like seasoning a wok.
Definitely No4 as well :D

LD
lemonD
Registered Member
 
Posts: 564
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 7:14 pm
Location: Essex


Return to Smoking and Barbecuing

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 35 guests

cron