by Vernon Smith » Thu Jun 22, 2006 12:20 pm
Wow, a whole lot of chatter going on overnight (Solomon time) so I might be a bit late with some of my thoughts that have been made redundant by well informed postings by the three wise men Oddley, Lee and Dave. But here goes anyway. Dave, I endorse Oddley's request that you keep going so we can all poison ourselves with full cognisance of what we have done. Thanks for your definition of >10% Oddley. It is now clear to me how you work out percentages. Paul's brine recipe appears in his posting on Brawn dated 03 Nov 2005. Sorry if I confused you with my quaint calculations of salt and sugar percentages "ingoing" (1:6 = 16.66%). You calculate percentages of the total solution so I agree that 1:8 = 12.5%. I stand corrected, thanks. I confused the issue further by referring to 3% KNO3. What I meant was 3% by weight of the salt that I rounded down from 33.3 to 30g/kg. If I follow your corrected convention my formula should look like this
1 kg salt 12.4533%
1 kg sugar 12.4533%
6 ltr water 74.7198%
30g KNO3 0.3736% (ingoing 373.6mg/kg)
Total brine weight 8030g. My total KN03 is below your 500mg/kg figure because I followed a formula I picked up from the University of Missouri that specifies 7lb salt, 4lb sugar and 3oz KN03. 3 oz in 112oz salt is 2.67857% that I rounded up to 3%. Does this look ok to you? I have used it several times and I'm still alive but I see how dangerous mixing conventions can be.
Aaah, Lee. I wondered when pH would come out of the woodwork. Thanks! This topic is really bubbling now. Using KNO3 should lead to low pH acidic conditions less than the arbitrary neutral factor of 7 but do you think our solutions will get down to your factor of 4 to prevent nasties propogating. Indeed, are we sure that all the nasties are acidophobic? Some may be acidophlic or secondarily acidophytic. Any ideas? You've already fessed up to being a microbiologist, so SUFFER!!! But seriously, this is great stuff and we all luvya lots. Unfortunately the Sol. Is. are a bit far to come for our party this w/e but we will all be thinking of you.
E. Coli, Staph. A, and Salmonellae all seem to be off the troublesome menu but micrococcus aurantiacis raises another issue. Psychrotrophic or psychrophilic? The whole process of curing seems to be a balance between pH, temperature, salinity, oxygen and KNO3 and I'm not sure any definitive answers have appeared yet but I'm sure we're getting there. Hopefully my 8 deg C hypotheses fits. I was a wildfowler back in Essex for a number of years and I don't know what bacteria went to work tenderising my ducks and game birds when hung. Temperatures varied between 0 deg 15 deg C and nobody got poisoned but this may need another topic. Is micrococcus aurantiacis salt tolerant? Oddley mentions that 10% salt kills most bacteria. The Swiss site refers to micrococcacae working at high pH, which conflicts with the low pH that you suggest to prevent growth of Cl. botulinum. What do you reckon to this? Curiouser and curioser. Oddley also raises this. If we rule out micrococci what else could be converting the Nitrate? I'm a bit worried that an abundance of micrococci that on face value are goodies converting the NO3 could spoil my ham unless there are some other goodies, without the side-effects, helping out. I injected 650ml of cure into a 6.5 kg ham to kick start the curing assuming, hopefully, that there are some species of NO3 converters in the muscle. I also assume the brine will kill off any nasties on the skin. Cheers for now guys, I'll check for more good stuff tomorrow.
Regards,
Vernon