Revisiting this subject has raised some interesting questions. My observations are:
1. Acidophilus obviously works in reducing PH - see link to research, and post above.
2. From the Holland & Barrett label we see that each of their Acidophilus tablets contains between 140mg and 141.5mg of active preventive cultures. (approx 7 tablets will give 1gm cultures)
3. Oregon state university state a usage rate of 0.5%, 5gm/1000gm meat or sausage, so each kg meat or sausage in theory needs 35 tablets. If this is correct we would also be adding 12.5gm per kg of other things that are in the tablets: Bulking Agents (Dicalcium Phosphate, Microcrystalline Cellulose), Citrus Pectin, Anti-Caking Agents (Silicon Dioxide, Magnesium Stearate).
4. HFW uses 1.5gm powder in about 615gm sausage (salami - 400gm meat, 100gm fat) to "to develop the correct (non-threatening) mould." Not, on the face of it, to reduce PH. He says you can use ground up tablets but quotes a figure for powder which doesn't have the same bulking agents (at least thishasn't). 1.5gm would be about 10 tablets if this supposition is correct.
5. There is a massive difference between the two, surely both of them can't be right!
6. Cost:
LS-25 costs <10p per kg sausage
Pure Acidophilus powder at 0.5% per kg about �1.50
Tablets at 35 per kg about �2.10
Even at a reduced % useage Acidophilus appears more expensive.
7. Ease of use
Acidophilus appears to be a 'shelf stable' product, easier to store and probably use.
I am now loath to buy, and PH test this. Firstly, I'm not sure my schoolboy science is adequate to carry any authority if I show any test online. Secondly, even if I have to dispose of some LS-25 at it's 'use by', it will still probably be cheaper.
Does anyone have further information on the subject?
Phil