Possibly purchasing a Bradley

Introductions and chatter

Postby wheels » Wed Apr 08, 2009 12:34 pm

WW

You say smoke times are lower - what sort of time are we talking about for (say) cold smoking streaky bacon?

Phil
User avatar
wheels
Global Moderator
 
Posts: 12894
Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Location: Leicestershire, UK

Postby welsh wizard » Wed Apr 08, 2009 1:33 pm

Hi Phil

What I am eluding to is the smoke times are lower than a traditional smoker because of the compact nature of the Bradley. Unfortunatly I only hot and cold smoke fish so cannot comment on bacon other than to say it really does depend on taste and the only real way to find out what suits you is to experiment. For example when I started smoking fish for myself I smoked salmon sides for 2.5 hours and I still do. However some of my friends prefer their sides smoked for 3 hours (and that short extension of time really does make a difference) for a more smokey flavour.

Cheers WW
Only those who go too far know how far they can go TSE
User avatar
welsh wizard
Registered Member
 
Posts: 1459
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 8:56 am
Location: Welsh Borders

Postby vinner » Wed Apr 08, 2009 1:52 pm

I smoke bacon in my Bradley at 200 degree F for about 3 hours, until it reaches an internal temp of 150 degrees.
" To be the stewards of what we have been given, to reap what we sow, to enjoy the harmony of it all.

me
vinner
Registered Member
 
Posts: 554
Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 12:22 am
Location: Texas

Postby fremented » Wed Apr 08, 2009 2:12 pm

Hi Phil,

They must have just came out with this.

You can save yourself a little cash by using a cardboard box and some Al dryer venting. I would not use it inside, in case of the box catching fire.

Rene

wheels wrote:Fremented

A link to the (presumably new) Bradley Cold Smoking Box is in a previous post. It's a 'posh' version of exactly what you describe.

Phil
User avatar
fremented
Registered Member
 
Posts: 87
Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 3:01 pm

Postby fremented » Wed Apr 08, 2009 2:19 pm

There many pictures of cold smoking units out there, google it.. here some pict from bradly forum with some links.

http://forum.bradleysmoker.com/index.php?topic=7008.0
User avatar
fremented
Registered Member
 
Posts: 87
Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 3:01 pm

Postby fremented » Wed Apr 08, 2009 2:24 pm

Nice wooden box idea.

Gordon wrote:Here are some images of my Smoker and cold smoke box "Click My Pics"
User avatar
fremented
Registered Member
 
Posts: 87
Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 3:01 pm

Pic of my Bradley cold smoker

Postby Jaunty » Sat Apr 25, 2009 6:31 pm

Here is a link to pic of my Bradley 4 rack digital smoker with the Bradley cold smoker adapter:

http://seantrent.smugmug.com/photos/520 ... wsM-X2.jpg

The water bowl goes in the middle chamber to catch and extinguish the spent pucks

Just to add, if you are spending the big bucks on a Bradley Smoker, then I think their own cold smoke solution is worth the �70. It is quality metal construction & matches the smoker, and you get the sensor bypass for the Digital versions. Sure, you could fashion something with a cardboard box, and make your own sensor bypass from a resistor, but surely you'd have made your own smoker if you were that bothered.

If you have an Original Bradley Smoker you are original old school, and may be the card board box solution is the way to go. :P
Jaunty
Registered Member
 
Posts: 173
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2008 3:36 pm
Location: London, England

bradley smoker

Postby trapperbruce » Sun May 17, 2009 12:39 am

if there is any canadians out there looking for bradley 4 shelf smoker with cold smoke attachment ...they are on sale at canadian tire this week for $100 off....@ $285.oo
<'))))>< bruce
trapperbruce
Registered Member
 
Posts: 26
Joined: Thu May 14, 2009 12:49 am
Location: whitehorse yukon canada

Postby This Little Piggy » Mon May 18, 2009 2:36 pm

In addition to the extra cost, another drawback of the digital version is that the clock can only be set for so many hours before it automatically shuts off. With the simpler, mechanical version, the only limit to how many hours you can smoke is the height of the bisquettes you can stack up in a feeder tube.

I quite agree with what everyone else has said about the limits on cold-smoking in the Bradley with the smoke generator inside. But, instead of the solution that Bradley and everyone else seems to have hit on (moving the smoke generator away and connecting it with some flexible ducting), I'm wondering if it would work equally well to construct a separate, cold-smoking box, which would simply sit on top of the existing Bradley unit.

This cold-smoking box would just need a hole in the bottom to fit over the exhaust vent at the top of the Bradley and a similar, adjustable vent cover on its top. If it's sized the same as the Bradley, you could use the same shelves in it. In this way, you would gain a cold-smoker and increase the capacity as much as you like. And, since it would be a cold-smoker, it could be simply constructed out of wood, without worrying about it catching on fire.

Sounds like a project for a cabinetmaker!
"Nothing exceeds like excess."

<a href="http://www.thislittlepiggy.us" target="_blank">This Little Piggy's blog</a>
This Little Piggy
Registered Member
 
Posts: 146
Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2008 4:23 pm
Location: Illinois, USA

Postby saucisson » Mon May 18, 2009 3:41 pm

Nice lateral thinking! :)

Dave
Curing is not an exact science... So it's not a sin to bin.

Great hams, from little acorns grow...
User avatar
saucisson
Site Admin
 
Posts: 6851
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 8:46 pm
Location: Oxford UK

Postby Gordon » Tue May 19, 2009 9:29 am

That could be my next project !!!! :D
<a>Chop On Line </a>
Gordon
Registered Member
 
Posts: 167
Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2006 1:35 pm
Location: Southend, Essex, UK

Postby This Little Piggy » Tue May 19, 2009 5:50 pm

Yesterday's brainstorm left me with a bad case of project-itis.

You can now read the complete description of my cold-smoking box for the Bradley over on my blog:

http://www.thislittlepiggy.us/2009/05/1 ... ey-smoker/
"Nothing exceeds like excess."

<a href="http://www.thislittlepiggy.us" target="_blank">This Little Piggy's blog</a>
This Little Piggy
Registered Member
 
Posts: 146
Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2008 4:23 pm
Location: Illinois, USA

Postby saucisson » Tue May 19, 2009 7:46 pm

Awesome :D

Dave
Curing is not an exact science... So it's not a sin to bin.

Great hams, from little acorns grow...
User avatar
saucisson
Site Admin
 
Posts: 6851
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 8:46 pm
Location: Oxford UK

Postby wheels » Tue May 19, 2009 8:39 pm

It's brilliant, but won't it be expensive to run for the long periods of time involved with cold smoking?
User avatar
wheels
Global Moderator
 
Posts: 12894
Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Location: Leicestershire, UK

Postby This Little Piggy » Tue May 19, 2009 9:11 pm

Yes, having to buy Bradley's bisquettes does make the smoking more expensive than it would be with solid wood�whether hot-smoking or cold-smoking.

That's part of the reason I hit on this idea of combining or daisy-chaining the two. Now I can plan my production so that I'm hot-smoking (in the Bradley) and cold-smoking (in the plywood box above) at the same time, and get twice as much done with the same smoke.
"Nothing exceeds like excess."

<a href="http://www.thislittlepiggy.us" target="_blank">This Little Piggy's blog</a>
This Little Piggy
Registered Member
 
Posts: 146
Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2008 4:23 pm
Location: Illinois, USA

PreviousNext

Return to Chatter

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 7 guests