by wheels » Sat Aug 20, 2011 4:08 pm
Jason
No, I didn't get them tested. One reason was the cost, the second was that the test would have only been for the salt. Nitrite testing would have cost an awful lot more.
Having done some more brine equilibrium curing, I found that the meat was more salty at the same % calculation than the injected. Given that, if the injected behaved as some thought it ought to and picked up a lot more salt/nitrite during the brining period, the product should have been a lot more salty than the equilibrium one, I concluded that there was nothing to worry about.
I'll explain:
I made an injection cure that at 10% gives:
149PPM Nitrite
1.93% salt
I put this in the brine for 7 days which, according to method 2, for the weight I was using should add an additional:
680PPM Nitrite
3.98% Salt
In total then, the ham should be:
829PPM Nitrite
5.91% salt
The ham was not soaked in water before cooking.
This ham should have had more than double the salt of the last brine equilibrium cure that I did. But in reality it has less. In side-by-side taste tests this is clearly apparent; the injected one which should have been over 5% salt is less salty than the one that was only brined which had around 2.5% salt - there's no doubt about it.
This leads me to believe that the ham has perfectly safe levels of nitrite as I can only assume, (as NCPaul did - and he's far better qualified than I am to comment) that the nitrite will behave in the same way as the salt.
Captain Wassname continues to explore this whole area (as do I) but we are hindered by not having the scientific equipment to test products, or cheap access to testing.
HTH
Phil